ES

Wiki · Fuel cycle

Spent fuel, reprocessing and dry storage

On the way out of the core, spent fuel is still hot and still useful. A third of the world's spent fuel is reprocessed at La Hague, Rokkasho still hasn't started after nearly thirty years of delays, and Atucha II is building its own dry cask facility for 2027.

A fuel assembly that leaves the core after three to six years can no longer sustain the reaction, but it is still intensely radioactive and hot: freshly shut down it releases about 6.5% of the thermal power it had at full load, and that fraction falls fast, to 1.5% after an hour and 0.4% after a day, though it never reaches zero. Burnup, the energy that fuel extracted per tonne of uranium, sets how much heat and radioactivity it carries: typical PWR values rose from 40–45 to 55 gigawatt-days per tonne, with 70 in sight. That is why all spent fuel first spends time in the plant's own pool, under water that cools and shields it, for at least a year and in practice five to ten.

From there the path splits. Many countries move the cooled fuel to dry casks: steel cylinders filled with helium inside concrete or steel overpacks, cooled only by natural air convection, with no pumps or electricity. Others reprocess it. At La Hague, France, Orano has operated since 1976 a plant with a capacity of 1,700 tonnes a year that has already reprocessed about 30% of the 400,000 tonnes of commercial spent fuel generated worldwide: it dissolves the fuel in concentrated nitric acid and separates the still-usable uranium and plutonium from the fission products by solvent extraction, the PUREX process. In Russia, Mayak's RT-1 plant has a nominal capacity of 400 tonnes a year, though in practice it reprocesses between 110 and 130.

Japan shows the opposite case: the Rokkasho plant, designed on La Hague's technology for 800 tonnes a year, began construction in the 1990s and has racked up more than twenty postponements of its startup date, still not operating commercially. It is proof that reprocessing is, besides a technical decision, an industrial undertaking of enormous scale and regulatory complexity.

Argentina does not reprocess: it goes straight from the pool to dry storage. Embalse has stored its spent fuel that way since the 1990s, and Atucha II is building its own system, ASECG II, in Zárate, because its decay pools are projected to reach capacity around December 2027. The project, led by Nucleoeléctrica Argentina, already has the high-strength concrete base for the casks in place and is advancing on fabricating the containers and armored lids; the design includes passive ventilation that keeps the elements' temperature in range without electricity or human intervention.

Illustration of a nuclear plant with its yard of dry storage casks for spent fuel
The path spent fuel takes at the plant: from the decay pool to the dry cask storage yard. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (United States) · CC BY 2.0

Quick facts

Decay heat≈ 6.5% at shutdown · 1.5% at one hour · 0.4% at one day
Typical burnup40 to 45 GWd/t · 55 already reached · 70 in sight
Pool≥ 1 year, in practice 5 to 10 years, before moving to dry storage or reprocessing
La Hague (France, Orano)1,700 t/yr capacity, operating since 1976 · ≈ 30% of the world's 400,000 t of spent fuel
Mayak RT-1 (Russia)400 t/yr nominal capacity · reprocesses in practice 110 to 130 t/yr
Rokkasho (Japan)800 t/yr design capacity · under construction since the 1990s, more than 20 postponements, still not operating
Argentinano reprocessing · Embalse dry since the 1990s · Atucha II (ASECG II, Zárate) targeted for December 2027
made by fedecaccia.com