Wiki · Accidents
The Fukushima Daiichi accident, step by step
The earthquake did exactly what it was meant to do: the three operating reactors shut themselves down in seconds. The accident began fifty minutes later, when a fifteen-metre wave arrived over a defence designed for five-seventy and everything that could cool the fuel went dark.
- 01
Six reactors on a terrace ten metres up
Fukushima Daiichi had six boiling water reactors commissioned between 1971 and 1979. Units 1 to 5 used the Mark I containment: a steel, light-bulb-shaped primary containment around the vessel, connected to a water-filled torus — the suppression pool — that condenses steam if the circuit breaks. All of it inside a concrete building whose top floor is light, meant for moving equipment, not for holding pressure.
The original ground, some thirty-five metres above sea level, had been cut down to ten metres to found the buildings on rock and shorten the lift for the cooling-water pumps. The design-basis tsunami height was 3.1 metres, revised to 5.7 metres in 2002. The emergency diesel generators, their switchgear and the batteries sat in the basements of the turbine buildings.
- 02
14:46 · the earthquake, and the design works
The magnitude 9.0 Tōhoku earthquake struck the coast at 14:46 on 11 March 2011. Units 1, 2 and 3 were operating and tripped automatically: the rods went in, fission stopped. Units 4, 5 and 6 were down for refuelling or maintenance, with unit 4's core fully unloaded into its pool.
Stopping fission does not stop the reactor. Fission products keep decaying and produce residual heat: around 6% of rated power in the first second, still close to 1% an hour later. A 1,380 MWt reactor is still making more than ten megawatts of heat an hour after shutdown, and that heat has to be removed for days.
The quake brought down the transmission lines and the plant lost offsite power. The thirteen emergency diesel generators started, the emergency cooling systems came in and everything worked as designed. For forty minutes, Fukushima Daiichi was a plant that had survived an earthquake larger than its design basis.
- 03
15:27 · the wave
The first wave arrived at 15:27 and did no damage. The second, minutes later, was of the order of fifteen metres: five metres above the terrace the reactors stand on, and nearly three times the revised design-basis height. Water came in through the doors and ducts of the turbine buildings and filled the basements.
Twelve of the thirteen diesel generators were knocked out. With them went the electrical switchgear, the seawater pumps that dump heat to the ocean, and much of the battery capacity. By 15:37 units 1 and 2 had no AC power at all: station blackout, the condition safety analyses treat as the limiting scenario.
The contrast sits twelve kilometres away: Fukushima Daini, with four units, took smaller waves, kept one offsite line and brought all four reactors to cold shutdown. Onagawa, closer still to the epicentre, is built on a terrace of nearly fifteen metres and rode it out. The difference was not the reactor design, it was the elevation.
- 04
With no power there is no instrumentation
A boiling water reactor has systems meant for exactly this: they run on the steam the reactor itself is still making. Unit 1 had isolation condensers, which condense steam against a water tank and return the condensate by gravity. Units 2 and 3 had RCIC and HPCI, steam-driven turbine pumps that inject water into the vessel.
All of them need DC power to open and close their valves, and above all to tell anyone what is happening. With no batteries there was no water level, no pressure, no valve position: operators worked with flashlights, carrying car batteries to feed individual instruments. On unit 1 the isolation condensers were isolated shortly after the blackout, and for hours they were believed to be running.
Unit 1 lost the water above its fuel that same afternoon. Units 2 and 3 held out longer, their turbine pumps working while there was steam and battery: unit 3 lost cooling in the early hours of the 13th and unit 2 on the 14th. In all three, once the water fell below the top of the fuel, what came next was the same.
- 05
Zirconium, water and hydrogen
The cladding that holds the fuel is a zirconium alloy. Above about 1,200 °C, zirconium strips the oxygen out of steam: it oxidises and releases hydrogen. The reaction is strongly exothermic, so as well as making gas it accelerates the heating of the core that produced it.
In all three units the fuel overheated, broke up and ended up melting to the bottom of the vessel; in unit 1 there is evidence that much of it went through the vessel and reached the concrete of the primary containment. Every kilo of oxidised zirconium leaves behind tens of grams of hydrogen, and that hydrogen, together with steam, pushed containment pressure far above its design value.
Saving the containment meant venting it, and venting demands valves that need power and compressed air, and a decision taken in the knowledge that radioactive material is being released to the atmosphere. The vents were late and hard-won. The hydrogen that left the containment did not all go outside: it collected under the light roofs of the reactor buildings.
- 06
12, 14 and 15 March · the explosions
At 15:36 on 12 March the top floor of unit 1's building exploded. The images of that gutted building went around the world and are, for most people, the Fukushima accident. At 11:01 on the 14th unit 3's building went, more violently. In the early hours of the 15th unit 4's building exploded, with its reactor empty: the hydrogen had reached it through a vent line shared with unit 3.
The explosions did not breach the vessels or the primary containments, but they wrecked the buildings, injured workers, scattered highly active debris across the site and for days made it harder to connect a pump or a cable. Unit 2, where the upper floor did not explode, produced the largest release instead: its containment lost integrity another way.
- 07
What came out, and what happened to people
Estimates of the atmospheric release run between 570 and 630 PBq iodine-131 equivalent — the first official figure, in June 2011, was 770 PBq — around 15% of what Chernobyl released. Much of it went out over the Pacific with the prevailing wind. The accident was first rated level 5 and a month later raised to level 7 for units 1 to 3 together.
Evacuation grew in rings: two kilometres on the night of the 11th, then three, then ten, then twenty kilometres at 18:25 on the 12th. More than a hundred thousand people left their homes. There were no deaths and no cases of radiation sickness among workers or the public; in 2018 Japan's labour ministry granted workers' compensation for the leukaemia of one emergency worker. UNSCEAR holds that no discernible increase in cancer attributable to the exposure is to be expected.
The real harm to people came from elsewhere. Fukushima prefecture counts 2,313 disaster-related deaths among evacuees — transfers of hospitals and care homes, interrupted treatment, dislocation — and that number excludes the direct victims of the earthquake and tsunami, some eighteen thousand people. It is the accident's most uncomfortable lesson: the badly executed evacuation killed, and the radiation did not.
- 08
The plant today
The four damaged units were written off for good and units 5 and 6 were closed as well. Spent fuel was removed from unit 4's pool in December 2014 and from unit 3 in February 2021. The first samples of melted fuel debris were taken from unit 2 in late 2024, with a telescopic arm and in quantities of grams: large-scale retrieval is aimed at the first half of the 2030s and full dismantling at thirty to forty years.
The water still used to cool the fuel debris, plus what seeps in, is treated in the ALPS system and, since August 2023, discharged diluted to the sea under IAEA review. Off site, the accident changed regulation across half the world: mobile and protected backup power, filtered containment vents, hydrogen recombiners, and an obligation to review external hazards — tsunami, flooding, seismic — against data rather than habit.
Comparison
The three accidents, side by side
| Three Mile Island | Chernobyl | Fukushima Daiichi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | 28 March 1979 | 26 April 1986 | 11 March 2011 |
| Reactor | 906 MWe PWR | 1,000 MWe RBMK-1000 | Three BWR Mark I |
| INES level | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| What set it off | Loss of feedwater and a relief valve stuck open | A low-power test with the rod margin used up | Earthquake and tsunami: total loss of electrical power |
| Containment | Full; it held | None | Full; damaged by hydrogen |
| Fuel | 45% of the core melted, 62 t | Core destroyed | Three cores melted |
| Release | ≈ 370 PBq, almost all noble gases | ≈ 14 EBq (5,200 PBq iodine-131 equivalent) | 570 to 630 PBq iodine-131 equivalent |
| Deaths from radiation | None | 2 in the explosions and 28 from acute radiation syndrome | None |
| Evacuation | Advised for pregnant women and children within 8 km | Pripyat and the 30 km zone: about 116,000 people in 1986 | More than 100,000 people |
| What changed afterwards | Operator training, control-room interface, INPO | Rods, void coefficient and safety culture across every RBMK | Backup power, filtered vents and hydrogen recombiners |
Reference
Quick facts
| Date | 11 March 2011 · Tōhoku earthquake at 14:46 JST |
|---|---|
| Plant | Fukushima Daiichi · six BWRs · units 1 to 5 with Mark I containment |
| Operating | units 1, 2 and 3 · units 4, 5 and 6 shut down |
| Tsunami design basis | 3.1 m, revised to 5.7 m in 2002 · terrace at 10 m |
| Wave | of the order of 15 m · first wave at 15:27 |
| Station blackout | 12 of 13 diesels lost · units 1 and 2 with no AC at 15:37 |
| Hydrogen explosions | unit 1 on the 12th at 15:36 · unit 3 on the 14th at 11:01 · unit 4 on the 15th |
| INES level | 7 (initially 5) |
| Release | 570 to 630 PBq iodine-131 equivalent · ≈ 15% of Chernobyl |
| Evacuation | more than 100,000 people · 20 km ring on 12 March |
| Deaths from radiation | none · 2,313 disaster-related deaths among evacuees (Fukushima prefecture) |
| Decommissioning | 30 to 40 years · fuel debris retrieval from the 2030s |
Further reading
- Animated guide
How a BWR works
Water boils inside the vessel and the steam goes straight to the turbine.
- Map
The plant on the atlas
- 1979 · INES 5
Three Mile Island
A relief valve stuck open, an indicator that showed the command instead of the position, and operators who throttled emergency injection: 45% of the core melted inside a containment that held.
- 1986 · INES 7
Chernobyl
A reactor with a positive void coefficient, a low-power test, and an emergency shutdown that, because of the graphite tips of its own control rods, began by inserting reactivity instead of removing it.