Comparison · 2026

EPR vs AP1000: active safety against passive safety

These are the two Generation III+ pressurized water reactors the West actually built. Framatome's EPR bets on redundancy: four loops, about 1,630 MWe net, double containment, four active safety trains and a core catcher. Westinghouse's AP1000 bets on simplification: two loops, about 1,110 MWe net and passive systems that cool the reactor by gravity and convection with no safety pumps and no operator action for 72 hours.

Figures from the atlas

EPRAP1000
Units built or under way822
Operating today48
Net capacity operating6,525 MWe9,122 MWe
CountriesChina, Finland, France, United KingdomChina, Poland, United States
First grid connection20182018
Most recent connection20242024
Under construction212
Shut down00
Most powerful unit operatingTaishan 1-1 (China), 1,660 MWeHaiyang 1-1 (China), 1,170 MWe
Average load factor, latest reported year75.4 %90.8 %

Data: Global Energy Monitor (CC BY 4.0), IAEA PRIS 2025, Wikipedia (CC BY-SA), Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons. Capacities in net MWe unless stated.

Differences

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger?

The EPR, at about 1,630 MWe net against 1,110 to 1,170 for the AP1000. Both are among the most powerful reactors in operation; the atlas ranking places them.

What does passive safety mean?

That cooling in an accident does not depend on pumps or electric power: the AP1000 uses gravity, natural convection and water stored at height, and its design needs no operator action for 72 hours.

Which was built first?

The first EPR connected to the grid was Taishan 1, in China, in June 2018, entering commercial operation that December; the first AP1000s were Sanmen 1, grid connected in June 2018, and Haiyang 1 in August of the same year. The table shows each connection per the atlas.

Animated guides

Sources

Other comparisons