Comparison · 2026

PWR vs CANDU (PHWR): natural uranium against enriched uranium

The CANDU and the PWR share the steam cycle and differ in the core. The CANDU is moderated by heavy water, which absorbs so few neutrons that natural uranium can be used, and instead of a vessel it has hundreds of horizontal pressure tubes refuelled without shutting the reactor down. The PWR is moderated by ordinary water, needs uranium enriched to 3.5 to 5% and is refuelled with the plant shut down.

Figures from the atlas

PWRCANDU
Units built or under way48170
Operating today31843
Net capacity operating304,963 MWe21,752 MWe
Countries389
First grid connection19571962
Most recent connection20242024
Under construction732
Shut down7212
Most powerful unit operatingTaishan 1-1 (China), 1,660 MWeDarlington 1 (Canada), 878 MWe
Average load factor, latest reported year81.9 %80.4 %

Data: Global Energy Monitor (CC BY 4.0), IAEA PRIS 2025, Wikipedia (CC BY-SA), Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons. Capacities in net MWe unless stated.

Differences

Frequently asked questions

Why can a CANDU use natural uranium?

Because heavy water barely absorbs neutrons, so the chain reaction is sustained with the 0.7% U-235 of natural uranium. With ordinary water too many neutrons are lost and enrichment is needed.

Are the Atucha reactors CANDUs?

No. Atucha 1 and 2 are heavy-water PHWRs but with a pressure vessel, a Siemens-KWU design; Embalse is a CANDU 6. That is why Atucha has its own guide in the wiki.

Which reactor refuels without shutting down?

The CANDU, thanks to its pressure tubes: fuelling machines at both ends swap fuel bundles with the reactor at power. A PWR needs a refuelling outage.

Animated guides

Sources

Other comparisons