Wiki · Fuel cycle
Spent fuel, reprocessing and dry storage
On the way out of the core, spent fuel is still hot and still useful. A third of the world's spent fuel is reprocessed at La Hague, Rokkasho still hasn't started after nearly thirty years of delays, and Atucha II is building its own dry store, ASECG II.
A fuel assembly that leaves the core after three to six years can no longer sustain the reaction, but it is still intensely radioactive and hot: freshly shut down it releases about 6.5% of the thermal power it had at full load, and that fraction falls fast, to 1.5% after an hour and 0.4% after a day, though it never reaches zero. Burnup, the energy that fuel extracted per tonne of uranium, sets how much heat and radioactivity it carries: typical PWR values rose from 40–45 to 55 gigawatt-days per tonne, with 70 in sight. That is why all spent fuel first spends time in the plant's own pool, under water that cools and shields it, for at least a year and in practice five to ten.
From there the path splits. Many countries move the cooled fuel to dry casks: steel cylinders filled with helium inside concrete or steel overpacks, cooled only by natural air convection, with no pumps or electricity. Others reprocess it. At La Hague, France, Orano has operated since 1976 a plant with a capacity of 1,700 tonnes a year that has already reprocessed about 30% of the 400,000 tonnes of commercial spent fuel generated worldwide: it dissolves the fuel in concentrated nitric acid and separates the still-usable uranium and plutonium from the fission products by solvent extraction, the PUREX process. In Russia, Mayak's RT-1 plant has a nominal capacity of 400 tonnes a year, though in practice it reprocesses between 110 and 130.
Japan shows the opposite case: the Rokkasho plant, designed on La Hague's technology for 800 tonnes a year, began construction in the 1990s and has racked up more than twenty postponements of its startup date, still not operating commercially. It is proof that reprocessing is, besides a technical decision, an industrial undertaking of enormous scale and regulatory complexity.
Argentina does not reprocess: it goes straight from the pool to dry storage. Embalse has operated its ASECQ silo field since 1993: fuel spends at least six years in the pool and then moves to concrete silos on site — 280 silos built and 250 full by late 2023, according to Argentina's eighth Joint Convention report to the IAEA. Atucha I opened ASECQ I in mid-2022: a building annexed to the pool hall, with 316 underground silos for 2,844 assemblies. Atucha II is building ASECG II on the same Lima, Zárate site; Nucleoeléctrica schedules the works for 2023–2027, with underground silos cooled by natural convection.
.jpg?width=1200)
Quick facts
| Decay heat | ≈ 6.5% at shutdown · 1.5% at one hour · 0.4% at one day |
|---|---|
| Typical burnup | 40 to 45 GWd/t · 55 already reached · 70 in sight |
| Pool | ≥ 1 year, in practice 5 to 10 years, before moving to dry storage or reprocessing |
| La Hague (France, Orano) | 1,700 t/yr capacity, operating since 1976 · ≈ 30% of the world's 400,000 t of spent fuel |
| Mayak RT-1 (Russia) | 400 t/yr nominal capacity · reprocesses in practice 110 to 130 t/yr |
| Rokkasho (Japan) | 800 t/yr design capacity · under construction since the 1990s, more than 20 postponements, still not operating |
| Argentina | no reprocessing · Embalse ASECQ since 1993 · Atucha I ASECQ I (2022, 2,844 assemblies) · Atucha II ASECG II (works 2023–2027) |
Further reading
- World Nuclear Association, Processing of Used Nuclear Fuel
- Wikipedia, Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant
- CNEA, Spent nuclear fuel
- Nucleoeléctrica Argentina, ASECQ I at Atucha I
- Nucleoeléctrica Argentina, new projects (ASECG II)
- Nucleoeléctrica Argentina, ASECG II tender
- IAEA Joint Convention, Argentina 8th National Report